• Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Home Global, Regional & National Security Security Issues Anti Terrorism Court rejects findings in India

Anti Terrorism Court rejects findings in India

E-mail Print PDF

An anti-terrorism court (ATC) rejected on Tuesday the findings of a Pakistani commission that visited India earlier this year to gather evidence of involvement of Pakistanis in the 2008 terror attacks in Mumbai.

In a knee-jerk reaction, India expressed disappointment over the ruling by the ATC-I in Rawalpindi, where suspected Pakistani abettors of the Mumbai attacks are being tried.

The suspects include Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi, a commander of the Lashkar-e-Taiba militant outfit.

Judge Chaudhry Habibur Rehman rejected the commission’s report saying the panel was not allowed to cross-examine four Indian prosecution witnesses and hence its findings have no evidential value.

The eight-member commission – comprising defence lawyers and prosecutors – visited India in April and recorded statements of Ramesh Mahale, the chief  investigation officer of Mumbai, Rama Vijay Sawanth, the magistrate who recorded Ajmal Kasab’s confession, and Shaliesh Mohiti and Ganash Dhondiraj, the two doctors who conducted the postmortem on 166 bodies.

The panel was, however, not allowed to cross-examine the prosecution witnesses.

“The commission was sent by the trial court in Pakistan and under national laws the accused have the right to question the witnesses testifying against them,” said Advocate Khawaja Haris Ahmed, the counsel for Lakhvi, in a petition filed on April 28.

The two countries had not reached an agreement on granting the accused their right to cross-examine the witnesses – and even if they did, such an accord was not legal.

Judge Habibur Rehman agreed the statements of Indian prosecution witnesses could not be taken into account. He ordered the commission to revisit India after seeking permission to cross-examine the witnesses.

Indian and Pakistani authorities should work out another deal to allow the defence lawyers to cross-examine the witnesses so that their statements could be used as evidence against the suspects.

The special public prosecutor of the Federal Investigation Agency agreed the statements carried no weight in a Pakistani court. He added that the two governments had agreed the panel would not question the Indian officials.

Upset over the ATC ruling, India said evidence collected by the commission had evidential value to punish the perpetrators of the Mumbai attacks, according to the Times of India.

“Our belief is that the evidence collected by the Pakistani commission is of evidential value,” Home Secretary R K Singh told reporters in New Delhi. New Delhi would seek a copy of the ATC ruling from the Pakistani authorities through Indian High Commission in Islamabad, Singh said.

“After we go through the judgment we will discuss with the Pakistan government as to what they propose to do about it,” he said.

Article Source:
The Express Tribune


Add comment

Security code

New ZoneAsia-Pk website

ZoneAsia-Pk has been upgraded!

We have launched a new version of our already great website. For latest updated content please visit our new ZoneAsia-Pk website.


Do you think media laws regarding live coverage need to be revisited?

Top News

  • After the tragedy: Citizens stand up for Pakistan
    Death visited Peshawar on Tuesday, the 16th of December, 2014. It brought one of the gravest tragedies that the city...
  • The snooze button
    By Abdulla Wasti ZoneAsia-Pk   I shall refrain from talking about how devastated or heartbroken I feel after the tragedy...
  • Let us never forget
    Pakistanis are a strange lot; we have witnessed more than our fair share of violence, extremism, dead bodies and devastation....
  • Time for a rethink
    By Minahil K. ZoneAsia-Pk In India, Ajit Doval inspires the envy of many—he is dubbed as the one man army, rightist...
  • Who gives India’s RAW sleepless nights
    One has got to admire Pakistan. Is there any other example in history where a small nation has simultaneously taken...